On 5 April 2018, Conor McGregor — at the time the biggest name in combat sports and one of the most commercially valuable athletes on the planet — entered the Barclays Center in Brooklyn, New York with a group of associates and attacked a UFC fighter bus. He threw a metal hand truck through a window of the vehicle, injuring several fighters inside. Michael Chiesa suffered facial lacerations that prevented him from competing that weekend. Ray Borg suffered an eye injury. The attack was filmed on multiple devices and the footage was immediately distributed globally. McGregor was charged with three counts of assault and one count of criminal mischief. He subsequently faced multiple civil lawsuits. The total legal and financial consequences of what appeared to be a spontaneous act of aggression ran to millions of dollars — and the liability lessons apply far beyond MMA.
The Criminal Case and What It Cost McGregor
McGregor pleaded guilty to a single count of disorderly conduct in July 2018. He was sentenced to five days of community service, a $50,000 fine, and mandatory anger management counselling. The criminal matter was resolved relatively quickly. The civil liability exposure was considerably more significant and more complex.
Michael Chiesa and Ray Borg both filed civil lawsuits against McGregor for the injuries they sustained. Chiesa's lawsuit sought damages for the facial injuries that forced him out of his scheduled bout — resulting in lost fight purse and bonus income — as well as ongoing medical costs and general damages for the assault. Borg similarly claimed for injuries and the financial consequences of his forced withdrawal from the card.
Both cases were settled out of court, with the settlement terms confidential. Based on what was known about the fighters' contracted purses and the likely damage calculations, legal analysts estimated the settlements ran to several hundred thousand dollars each. McGregor's total legal costs — criminal defence, civil settlements, and the associated management of the crisis — are estimated to have exceeded $1 million.
What Liability Insurance Covers — and What It Doesn't
McGregor's bus attack illustrates a critical principle in liability insurance: intentional acts are not covered. Standard personal liability insurance — and the liability provisions in most sports-related policies — excludes coverage for intentional, deliberate acts. An insurance policy is designed to cover the financial consequences of accidents and negligence, not the deliberate choice to assault someone.
This means that McGregor's personal liability insurance — whatever its terms — would not have covered the civil claim settlements arising from the bus attack. He bore those costs personally. This is an important distinction for athletes: liability insurance provides essential protection against accidental harm caused to third parties, but it does not protect against the financial consequences of deliberate conduct.
The UFC's Liability Exposure: Organisation Responsibility
Beyond McGregor's personal liability, the attack raised significant questions about the UFC's organisational liability. The bus was a UFC-organised transport facility. The event at which the attack occurred was a UFC media event. Fighters were present at the Barclays Center in the context of their professional obligations to the UFC.
The UFC faced potential liability claims on the basis that they had a duty of care to the fighters under their protection and that their security arrangements at the event had failed to prevent the attack. The UFC settled with the injured fighters as part of the overall resolution of claims — acknowledging at least a degree of organisational responsibility for the security failure.
For any sports organisation — at any level — the McGregor case demonstrates that liability exposure extends beyond the sport itself. Any event, gathering, or activity organised under the organisation's banner creates liability exposure that must be covered by appropriate insurance.
McGregor's Post-Attack Career and Insurance Implications
The liability consequences of the bus attack extended into McGregor's subsequent career in ways that are instructive. When he returned to the UFC and signed new promotional agreements, the legal history of the attack was a factor in how those agreements were structured. Insurance provisions in his contracts — particularly provisions relating to conduct that could damage the UFC's reputation or create organisational liability — were tightened as a direct result of the April 2018 incident.
McGregor's subsequent career also featured a serious leg injury — a tibia fracture suffered in the trilogy fight against Dustin Poirier in July 2021 — that raised its own insurance questions. The interaction between his personal insurance coverage, his UFC promotional contract provisions, and the specific circumstances of the injury illustrates how the liability and disability insurance questions are often intertwined in the careers of high-profile combat sports athletes.
The Liability Lessons for Every Sports Organisation
- Intentional acts are not insured: Athletes who commit deliberate assaults bear the financial consequences personally — insurance does not cover intentional harm.
- Organisational events create organisational liability: Any event you organise creates a duty of care to everyone present. Security, supervision, and risk management all affect liability exposure.
- Athlete conduct can create employer liability: When an athlete's conduct at an organisational event injures third parties, the organisation may share liability for failing to prevent it.
- Reputational damage has financial consequences: Beyond the direct legal costs, the McGregor bus attack affected his commercial relationships and insurance terms in ways that continued for years.
Sports liability is not an abstract concept. It is a real financial exposure, demonstrated in real cases, with real consequences. McGregor's bus attack is the most dramatic recent illustration — but the liability principles it demonstrates apply in every sport and at every level of competition.
Add a Comment